Summary of stage
Juliet is, according to the writing stages put forth by Rubin and Carlin, somewhere between a semi phonetic and a phonetic writer. They define the semi phonetic stage as when a student, “understand(s) that there is a relationship between letters and sounds, yet [is] not able to match all the sounds with the letters.” (p 729). The phonetic monolingual English writer, on the other hand, “is able to match most of the phonetic sounds to letters.” According to the authors the monolingual Spanish writer at this stage of development begins to write one symbol for each letter, rather than one sound for each syllable. Carlin and Rubin also state that the bilingual writer can do both of these things at the phonetic stage, and additionally begins to notice that words are transcribed uniquely in either language.
Juliet demonstrated a fairly consistent letter: sound usage, and clearly knows that you can transcribe sounds with symbols. She still doesn’t hear difficult sounds (such as ‘coredo’ for ‘corriendo’), which Rubin and Carlin state to be typical in both the semi-phonetic and phonetic stages. In Spanish she is not using one sound for each syllable, but in English she is likely to represent sounds with graphemes that are not representative of the sounds she is hearing. The reason I don’t think Juliet is a transitional writer yet is that she still isn’t applying rules from either language to spelling patterns, even though she has some sight words (‘the’ and ‘is’) in English, and uses conventions more consistently in Spanish.
Self as a writer
Juliet sees writing as a way to notate stories drawn and told. She is very comfortable with the draw-speak-write pattern of interaction, which she clearly uses in class. She doesn’t see writing as a means for communication yet, however, in the sense that we may expand or edit ideas to make them clearer for the audience. She was more interested in working through each word than in working out the ideas or the sentence.
Problem solving attempts at difficulty
After she speaks her story, Juliet will say the words slowly, syllable-by-syllable, to hear the sounds. She will write the sounds in order left to right, and tends to hear both consonants and vowels equally.
She had trouble hearing or transcribing vowel sounds in English, and often added an ‘i’ for unclear reasons. In her first English writing she wrote all the words with phonetic beginning, middles, and ends, and when she got to the word ‘I’, she put down a lower-case ‘I’. But she stopped, saying, “Wait…that doesn’t sound right.” She changed her writing by scratching out the letter and putting down, “ai”. This is a closer approximation in the Spanish phonetic code of an English sounds for ‘I’.
Inter-linguistic transfer
Juliet relied primarily on the Spanish phonetic code to transcribe English words. She may not have been explicitly aware of the fact that Spanish and English words are written differently, but her oral development is such that she knew which sounds to transcribe. This again points towards a phonetic speller, with hints of semi-phonetic. Her spelling approximations definitely used code from across the languages. Her word-boundary confusions may be related more to the concept about print of spacing than the oral development of discreet words in either language. Her codes in both languages are phonetic and don’t yet rely on generalized rules or sight words, with the notable exception of ‘the’ and ‘is’.
Notes/ observations
Juliet is a very creative story teller, and very excited to someday ride a horse (just like mommy!). She loved her dog Cherry very much, and was sad when he had to go to the vet. She demonstrated no oral code-switching during our writing time in English, but did code switch during our Spanish writing time. Her code is definitely more active in Spanish for transcription than in English, and she has more concepts about print accessible to her in Spanish as well. When we discussed the ideas of ‘sentences’, she didn’t know what I meant, but when we talked about ‘frases’ she understood.
Juliet is in a Spanish-only literacy instruction DLI setting, and I think her primary code for writing is therefore Spanish. She has obviously been exposed to English text and print, however, because she has acquired some sight words in English.
Hello Gwen!
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, what an impressive blog posting you have here. It was very interesting to find out so much information about Juliet's writing development. It was curious to see how she indeed added 'i' for no reason at all in some of her writing samples. What do you think that may be attributed to? I am still trying to figure that out.
Now that you have used Juliet's writing sample to understand her literacy development, what intervention tactics do you think you will use in the future to help further develop her writing in English/Spanish? Do you think you can apply the suggested solutions outlined in the "Meeting the challenges of Second Language Writing Developemnt in the Immersion Classroom" reading? Being a Kindergarten teacher working with a Kindergarten student myself, I find the solutions not so applicable for this age bracket, and wonder what else I can do to facilitate the students writing development. What are your thoughts?
Hi, Paola!
ReplyDeleteYou know, I actually think Juliet used 'i' purposefully in almost every sample she provided, even though she had some confusions about when to use each sound.
In 'mai' for 'my', I think she heard the sounds in English and transcribed it with a Spanish diphthong. She uses the Spanish, short 'i' sound for her approximation of 'sick', and then I saw her write the lower case, 'i' for "I". BUT--she crossed it out. I wonder if she has seen the word "I" written before, and instinctively put it down. Then she stopped and crossed it out because she heard the phonetics for 'ai' in Spanish, sounding as "I" in English.
My response is starting to sound redundant...but the pattern continues:
'ai; --> I (and also, 'ia', because I think she flipped the sounds she heard previously)
'uis' --> was. (Try saying these all with Spanish phonetic codes)
'hcrei' -> Cherry (She wrote the 'ch' backwards, but made the sounds correctly while writing. Same with the 're'. /ch/ /er/ /i/.)
'ciut' --> cute /(c/ /i/ /oo/ /t/)
The only sample that I couldn't see this in was the 'uisi' for 'was'. I think that she may have gone back and added that last 'i' in after writing her whole sentence. I wonder if that was just an exta, since she may have been aware that she had made some mistakes along the way.
But its pretty interesting, huh?
In our 90/10 DLI model, we won't work on English writing until 2nd or 3rd grade, so I'm not worried about interventions yet. Also, she is developing ahead of schedule in Spanish, so I think her current balanced literacy program is an appropriate set up for our friend.